I could hardly believe my eyes when a Facebook friend posted a column from a Baltimore Sun writer titled: “Pit bulls: Own them at your own risk.” Surely, the writer is making some sort of joke. His pit bull must have done something incredibly cute, like eat his kid’s birthday cake or something, right?

According to a Baltimore Sun columnist, pit bulls are "four-legged time bombs." Try telling that to this sweetie, Kaia Shanks. (Photo/Sarah Shanks)
I was stunned to find out the author, Dan Rodricks, was being serious.
His column talked about a pet costume contest he was judging and the fact that having pit bulls present “made it weird.”
He sounded as if he was waiting for one of the pit bulls to break loose and attack everyone at any minute.
In his column, which semi-focused on Maryland’s recent court decision declaring pit bulls inherently dangerous, Rodricks says:
The evidence shows clearly that such attacks are disproportionate to the number of pit bulls in society, that they inflict far more damage than other dogs, and that their attacks are associated with a higher risk of death. Pit bull jaws are three times stronger than those of a German Shepard.
Really, Dan? First, if you’re going to write about dogs and try to establish any credibility, spell the name of the breed correctly: It’s German shepherd dog. Citing where you discovered your “facts” might also have helped. If the attacks are disproportionate to the number of pit bulls in society, what are those figures? And the legitimate sources I found all say a pit bull’s jaws are no stronger than any other large breed.
Dr. Brady Barr of National Geographic conducted a test for a “Dangerous Encounters: Bite Force” television show a few years back. He tested the pressure per square inch of various animals, including man (120 pounds), snapping turtles (1,000 pounds), lions (600) and domestic dogs (320). For the domestic dog testing, Barr used a pit bull, Rottweiler and German shepherd dog. The pit bull (235 pounds) had the lowest of the three. The German shepherd was 238 while the Rottweiler was 328 pounds.
At least Rodricks didn’t try to tell his readers that pit bulls have a special “locking jaw.” According to Dr. I. Lerh Brisbin of the University of Georgia, “There is absolutely not evidence for the existence of any kind of ’locking mechanism’ unique to the structure of the jaw and/or teeth of the American Pit Bull Terrier.”
Had Rodrick checked with the National Canine Research Council, he would have found plenty of information about attacks, particularly fatal dog attacks. The NCRC each year publishes a full report on fatal dog attacks in America, and prefaces each with the many facts that should be considered whenever a rare fatal attack occurs. In fact, the NCRC investigates the attacks so thoroughly, it takes a full year for them to publish their annual reports.
The NCRC currently has a post of its report on the 2010 fatal dog attacks in America (still investigating 2011, which will be published in 2013). In many of the 33 fatal attacks in 2010 (considering a dog population estimated at 78 million, the deaths are extremely rare), the breed of dog involved either was indeterminate (in 19 cases) or the dog could not be found 3 cases). Of the 11 cases in which the breed of dog was identified, eight different breeds were named. Yes, American pit bull terrier was among them. Also listed: Siberian husky, Rottweiler, boxer, American bulldog and a German shepherd dog.
In many cases, dogs were reported by witnesses, and especially by the media, to be pit bulls. Yet DNA and photographic evidence found either the dogs were a different breed or an indeterminate mixed breed. In some cases through the years, the media reported dogs to be pit bulls that were later determined to be another breed. The media failed to write corrections to clarify the breed.
Perhaps more telling than the breed of dog involved is the circumstances around the attacks. Of the 33 deaths related to dog attacks in 2010, the NCRC reports that 21 of those attacks involved resident dogs, not family pets. NCRC defines residents dogs as “those whose owners isolate the dogs from regular, positive human interactions. Owners often keep resident dogs isolated on chains, in junkyards, or allow their dogs to roam unattended. Owners of resident dogs often fail to provide basic humane care for their dogs resulting in animals that suffer from malnutrition or chronic disease or illness.”
Many of the cases involved unsupervised children left with a dog or wandering into a dog’s yard. Some involved the dog’s owners participating in other criminal activity. Some were in packs, others were caused by a single dog.
The point is, dog attacks on humans are rare. Bite statistics are difficult to track, since many attacks by smaller dogs don’t require hospitalization and often are not reported. As far as fatalities, there were 308 million people and 78 million dogs in the U.S. in 2010. There were 33 dog-related fatalities. Just for good measure, the number of murders in the U.S. in 2010 was 14,748.
I am not a pit bull owner, but I am a responsible pet owner. I don’t discriminate against any breed, and I certainly wouldn’t label one a “four-legged time bomb,” as Rodricks did. Rodricks is entitled to his opinion. I just wish he had the facts to back it up. Judging by the tone of many of the 670-and-counting comments on his column, a few others agree.